|
Globalization of American Education System is now a household concept in
educational meetings. In 1998 a report, “Educating for Global Competence”,
by the American Council on Education’s Commission on International Education
called upon universities to pay special attention to the global context in
preparing students for the future. The first paragraph of the Executive
Summary of the report states:
|
|
“America’s future depends upon our ability to develop a citizen base
that is globally competent. Our nation’s place in the world
will be determined by our society – whether it is internationally
competent, comfortable and confident. Will our citizens be
competent in international affairs, comfortable with cultural
diversity at home and abroad, and confident of their ability to cope
with the uncertainties of a new age and a different world?”
|
|
The
pursuit of excellence will require the integration of global perspectives
and the promotion of international experiences as being central to the
mission of the university and to campus life. These priorities need to be
embodied in policies that promote and reward the initiatives of faculty,
students, and staff, as they become responsive to the global context. The
internationalization process, most often referred to as “globalization,”
requires a new approach to institutional priorities as well as a different
understanding of the context of the student learning experience and the
student’s needs for future careers. In other words, rather than mere
enhancements to research activity and the learning experience, pursued in
specialized or relatively isolated departments and programs labeled
“international”, global and cross-cultural perspective must pervade our
campus cultures; these perspectives must move from margin to mainstream.
The
following statements culled from the literature on International Education reinforce the need for international education in
American Colleges and Universities, including the University of Maryland
Eastern Shore.
·
If our nation and its people are to prosper in the new
environment of the 21st century, our colleges and universities
must truly be institutions without boundaries. Their leaders must re-think
what is taught, how it is taught, where it is taught, and who teaches it.
·
Most courses taught at our universities have a limited global
perspective, and teaching faculty lack sufficient international exposure and
knowledge to act as catalysts for internationalizing their courses.
·
Emerging national needs require universities to organize
themselves to educate students for competence and success in an
interdependent world, for the 21st century. This kind of
competence needs to be provided not as something extra in the
curriculum, but as an integral part of the educational experience.
·
As a practical matter, what this means is that the entire
nation’s two and four-year institutions of higher education must avail
themselves to new goals for international education.
·
Colleges and universities have a great deal to do, if they
choose to take seriously the task of preparing their students for a global
society. New thinking, different rewards, and revised structures for
teaching and learning will be needed.
·
Knowledge and understanding of other countries and cultures
are prerequisite to the international collaboration required to address
global and regional problems.
·
The challenges of global transformation in national security,
foreign policy, competitiveness, the environment, public health, population
control, and the eradication of want and misery resulting from famine,
natural disasters, or population dislocations call for many more U.S.
citizens with in-depth expertise and knowledge of other nations, including
their languages, cultures, political, economic, and social systems.
·
Graduates who can function effectively in a global environment
can provide direct benefits to businesses, helping them access emerging
international markets, supporting the export efforts of small and mid-size
companies that have become the greatest source of new jobs in America.
·
New emphases on the international dimensions of curricula
support higher education’s public service functions, enabling better
outreach to primary and secondary schools, the community, the media, and the
government.
·
International exchange programs, whether for undergraduates,
graduate students, or faculty members, provide Americans with first-hand
experience in other cultures that often is essential in gaining
international competence. |